The
True Witness… and Blind Injustice
Mark
14:53-65
Introduction:
In his commentary on Mark, R.C. Sproul said, “It is unthinkable that the Messiah, the Ruler and Sustainer of the
universe, should be subjected to a trial by mere men…” (Mark, p.
382). Of course, Jesus spoke only truth, He never sinned, He was guilty of
nothing. The injustice of this procedure is evident at every point, His
accusers are guilty, Jesus is without sin, innocent, righteous, holy… The Law
required honest testimony, and fair trials. We read in Leviticus 19:15-16,
15 "You shall do no injustice in
court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in
righteousness shall you judge your neighbor.
16 You shall not go around as a slanderer among your people,
and you shall not stand up against the life of your neighbor: I am the LORD.
Do
you remember how this chapter started? We read in 14:1,
It
was now two days before the Passover... And the chief priests and the scribes
were seeking how to arrest him by stealth and kill him…
Their
minds were made up. There would be
no fair investigation of the truth. They were determined not only to arrest
Him, but they were determined to kill Him. Until now Jesus has kept full
disclosure of His identity low key, revealed only to a few. Now it will come
front and center. This is why He came…
The Maine* Idea: Jesus,
Messiah, Son of Man, and Son of God, willingly endured injustice at the hands
of men, so that we could be justified before God.
I. The Illegal convening of the
Sanhedrin: At night, in darkness (53-54).
53 And they led Jesus to the high
priest. And all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes came
together. 54 And Peter had
followed him at a distance, right into the courtyard of the high priest. And he
was sitting with the guards and warming himself at the fire.
The moment the leaders of the Jews had
long been planning and maneuvering to bring about was at hand. The brought Jesus under the cover of darkness
to the home of the High Priest, Caiaphas. We know from comparing the other
Gospels that there was an initial stop at the home of the “High Priest
Emeritus,” Annas, but Mark doesn’t give us that detail. So, rather than taking Jesus to the Chamber
of Hewn Stone where the Sanhedrin traditionally met, they brought Him to the
home of the High Priest, Caiaphas, and “all
the chief priests and the elders and the scribes came together.” This is
described as “the whole council” in
v.55, and so it seems to me that this is a meeting of the Sanhedrin. It doesn’t
necessarily mean every last one was there, but at least enough of them to
constitute a quorum. The Sanhedrin was
not supposed to meet during the feast, nor were they to come together at night.
But here they were. The timing of their actions also seem symbolic, they are
acting in the darkness, and spiritually speaking, they are in the
darkness.
Peter warms himself by the fire with the
guards… (Mark will return to Peter
after this scene). I mentioned in our Wednesday night study that for me
this is a convicting scene. Think about it, this is Peter, the Rock, the one
who said “though they all desert you, I
will never leave you, I will die with you…” Now he is there, blending in
with the guards and others present in the High Priest’s courtyard… sitting by
the fire and warming himself. Peter had boasted that he would die rather than
deny Him, and now Jesus is being spit on and beaten and mocked, and Peter is
sitting quietly by, in between a guard and a servant girl! Perhaps close enough to see and hear what is
happening, but unwilling to stand up and be identified with Christ. Before we
judge Peter, we should ask ourselves, are we content to “blend in” with the
world? Are we comfortable going through life without making too many waves?
Without drawing too much attention? Enjoying the warmth of the fire, rather
than risking being “exposed” as a Christ-follower? R.C. Sproul similarly asked,
Are
you following Jesus from a distance? Do the people with whom you interact each
day know that you are a Christian? I am not asking whether you wear your
Christianity on your sleeve and make a pest of yourself to your friends and
coworkers. I am simply asking whether they know where your allegiance lies. If
they do not, perhaps you are keeping a safe distance from your Savior”
(Mark p. 382).
Remember
His call in chapter 8, “If anyone would
be my disciple, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow me…”
That leaves no room for “easy believism.” It is a radical call to discipleship,
a call to count the cost of being a Christ-follower. It means loving Him more
than the world, more than life! He showed us His love, He endured injustice at
the hands of men so that we could be justified before God.
II. The Injustice of
false-witnesses (55-61a). They had pre-determined the
outcome they desired, and clearly felt the end justified the means. Their
intentions expressed in 14:1 are now in the process of being carried out.
55 Now the chief priests and the whole
Council were seeking testimony against Jesus to put him to death, but they
found none. 56 For many bore
false witness against him, but their testimony did not agree. 57 And some stood up and bore
false witness against him, saying, 58
"We heard him say, 'I will destroy this temple that is made with hands,
and in three days I will build another, not made with hands.'" 59 Yet even about this their
testimony did not agree. 60
And the high priest stood up in the midst and asked Jesus, "Have you no
answer to make? What is it that these men testify against you?" 61 But he remained silent
and made no answer.
Mark tells us that the chief priests and
the “whole Council” were seeking testimony to justify putting Jesus to death. This
was no fair trial, no objective inquiry. They were not investigating the facts
or seeking truth. They had made up their minds long ago that Jesus had to go.
And they were not going to miss this opportunity. They were not seeking
truthful witnesses, they were seeking
testimony to put Him to death… Our minds are made up, let’s invent a
narrative to get it done!
False witnesses were bought forth, but
they contradicted each other. They needed corroborating witnesses but they all
apparently had differing stories! Some of them said that Jesus had spoken
against the Temple. What had Jesus
said about the Temple? In the previous chapter (13) He had predicted its
destruction, and back in John 2, at the outset of His public ministry, He had
used the figure of the Temple metaphorically, to speak of His coming death and
resurrection. Let’s read a few of those verses…
Mark
13:1-2 And as he came out of the temple, one of his
disciples said to him, "Look, Teacher, what wonderful stones and what
wonderful buildings!" 2
And Jesus said to him, "Do you see these great buildings? There will not
be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down."
He
was clearly prophesying the future destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem,
which would be razed by the Romans in AD 70. In this discourse on the Mount of
Olives He didn’t say that HE would destroy the Temple, only that it would be leveled.
And, by the way, that is exactly what happened. Now back in John 2 there was a
different exchange. After cleansing the Temple for the first time, near the
outset of His public ministry, the Jewish leaders challenged His authority for doing
such a thing…
Jn
2:18-21 So the Jews said to him, "What sign do
you show us for doing these things?"
19 Jesus answered them, "Destroy this temple, and in
three days I will raise it up." 20
The Jews then said, "It has taken forty-six years to build this temple,
and will you raise it up in three days?"
21 But he was speaking about the temple of his body.
Here
it seems Jesus is intentionally veiling a prophesy of His death and
resurrection. In the context John tells
us that only after the resurrection would the disciples “remember” that He had
said these things. In John 2:21, as the narrator of the Fourth Gospel, he lets
the reader have a little more information, i.e.,
He was speaking not about the physical building, but about His body.
It seems that these false witnesses are
blending together and distorting these two different prophecies which had two
different referents. And in neither case did Jesus say He would be the one to
destroy the temple! V.61 tells us that
Jesus did not respond to these convoluted, false charges. He remained silent,
which evokes the description of the Servant in Isaiah 53:7…
“He
was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth; like a lamb
that is led to the slaughter, and like a sheep that before its shearers is
silent, so he opened not his mouth.” (Isa 53:7).
That
beautiful chapter describes the righteous, suffering, servant. He was willing
to be the lamb led to the slaughter. The testimony of these so-called witnesses
collapsed on itself, one contradicted the other. Without corroboration in a
capital case there could be no conviction. Jesus, like a lamb being led to
slaughter, remained silent. He endured injustice at the hands of men so that we
could be justified before God.
III. One Isolated Witness Spoke
Truthfully: Jesus responds to the direct question of the
High Priest (61b-62). Who do you claim to
be?
Again,
the high priest asked him, "Are you the Christ, the Son of the
Blessed?" 62 And Jesus
said, "I am, and you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of
Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven."
…I AM… Messiah and “Son of God” rightly
defined… The High Priest was clearly frustrated by the inability of their
false-witnesses to get their stories together. And so, he switches to another
tactic, to seek to get Jesus to say something that they could use against Him,
to catch Him in His own words. And he gets right to the point: “Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?”
These titles are used side-by-side, in parallel, appositionally. “Christ,” as we have seen, is the Greek
translation of the word “Messiah,”
the “Anointed One.” The High Priest
further asks, “Are you the Christ, the
son of the Blessed?” What the High Priest meant by that second title
was “Son of God.” This was an example
to the Jewish practice of avoiding saying the name of God. They would use
phrases like “Kingdom of Heaven” rather than saying “Kingdom of God,”
or, as here, “Son of the Blessed,”
in place of “Son of God.” The question was clear. Who do you claim to
be? Are you, or are you not, the Messiah, the Promised One of Israel?”
Until now, as Mark has been telling the
story of Jesus, he is showing us that when people came to understand who Jesus
was, almost always He told them to keep it to themselves. In the light of the
full context of the Gospel we can see that He was saying, “Keep it to
yourself for now.” That is, until the right time. This
so-called “messianic secret” was part of Him controlling the unfolding of His
story. His teaching and the miracles that He did bore witness to who He is. Yet
He guarded the flow of information. Even back in chapter 8, when Peter,
speaking for the twelve said “You are the
Christ,” Jesus’ immediately warned them not to tell anyone about Him (Mk
8:29,30). Why? Revealing His identity too soon would precipitate more
opposition and even violence at the hands of the leaders. It wasn’t time yet
for them to be His witnesses. But the hour had now come, and He, the True
Witness, speaks.
Are You
the Son of the Blessed? Who are
you, Jesus? Mark here includes for us Jesus direct answer to that question in
His response to the High Priest. The answer He gives was the truth, the whole
truth, and nothing but the truth. His answer has at least three components
indicating the full and correct understanding of the person of the Messiah. Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? Jesus
answer is affirmative, but I think He is saying more, essentially challenging
the High Priest’s understanding of the person and nature of the Messiah…
1)
“I AM…” Remember the
historical context, Jesus had just revealed His authority as the great I AM
when the contingent appeared to arrest Him (Jn 18:5,6). Against that
background, He says the same thing here: “I
AM.” The God who spoke to Moses from the burning bush stood before the
ruler of the people, incarnate, the Promised One and the Hope of Israel, and
was not recognized by him! It seems to me that Jesus is saying more than “yes”
in answering the High Priest with these words.
2) You
will see… the Son of Man seated at
the right hand of Power… (He alludes there to Psalm 110:1; “The LORD
said to my Lord, sit at my right hand until I make the nations a footstool for
your feet…” ). The Son seated at the right hand of God, called “Lord” by
David, and so clearly greater than him… Who’s Son is He? The Son of God!
3) Jesus also makes reference to Dan 7:13,14 when he describes the Son of Man… coming on the clouds of heaven... We read in Daniel 7,
Daniel
7:13-14 13 I saw in the night visions,
and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man,
and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him. 14 And to him was given dominion
and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve
him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away...
Jesus
refers to this vision of Daniel, and this messianic figure coming on the clouds
of heaven and being given an eternal kingdom. He is speaking to the
religious leader of the Jews, essentially saying yes, I am the Messiah, but do
you understand what that really means? The great I AM, the Son of God, the Son
of Man! He knew how the religious
leaders would respond to this straight forward declaration! He gave a true
witness, even though He knew their minds were made up. It is why He came. To
endure injustice at the hands of men so that we could be justified before God.
IV. The Illegitimate Judge: The High Priest Disqualified Himself in
tearing his robe and unjustly condemning Jesus for blasphemy (63-65).
63 And the high priest tore his garments
and said, "What further witnesses do we need? 64 You have heard his blasphemy.
What is your decision?" And they all condemned him as deserving death. 65 And some began to spit on him
and to cover his face and to strike him, saying to him, "Prophesy!"
And the guards received him with blows.
The
irony here is overwhelming. A human “judge” charging the Creator of the
Universe, God the Son, the One who knows the hearts of will judge the souls of
every human, with blasphemy!? That is the highest form of blasphemy
imaginable!
“…tore his garments… (See Lev.
21:10). This action by the High Priest was intended to indicate His righteous
indignation at what he considered the blasphemous answer of Jesus. The Law actually
prohibited the tearing of the High Priest’s garments (Lev 21:10). [It
occurs to me that the soldiers would later cast lots for Jesus’ garment, it
would not be torn!]. The Mishnah, the written collection of the traditions
of the Rabbis, permitted it only in the case of blasphemy. That is the claim here, not that claiming to
be the messiah would be blasphemous in itself. Seemingly the High Priest
discerns that Jesus is claiming more than that… His claim to be the Son of God
is to be understood as a claim to deity. Did he hear the expression “I AM” in
its fullest sense? Did He understand what Jesus was implying by calling Himself
God’s Son? If so, he was right about Jesus’ claim, but totally wrong in
rejecting Him. Jesus was the one, truthful witness who testified that day!
The only blasphemy that day was the leaders rejecting Him, beating and mocking
Him, sentencing Him to death. By the way, the Law required that blasphemers by
stoned (Lev 24:15,16). But the Romans did not authorize the Jews to carry out
capital punishment. So, the High Priest had to manipulate the situation so that
the Roman authorities would carry out his bidding. A thousand years earlier God
had inspired David to write out a psalm, Psalm 22, that perfectly described a
crucifixion!
See
Mark 8:31; 10:34, as he had prophesied… Jesus had predicted, specifically
that the leaders would reject Him, mock Him, even spit on Him (cf. Isa 50:6).
And yes, He would be tortured and put to death. But that wasn’t the end of the
story. He would rise on the third day!
What is God saying to me in
this passage? Jesus endured injustice at the hands of men
so that we could be justified before God.
What would God have me to do in
response to this passage? Let’s
start with Peter warming himself by the fire, next to the guard. Do we
sometimes stay silent, and fail to be a voice for righteousness, failing to
hold forth the Gospel? Lord forgive us! Consider what He willingly endured for
us. The Just suffering for the unjust, so that we could be forgiven, reconciled
to God. He saved us on purpose, for a purpose. Will you embrace that truth, and
follow Him?
Peter reflected on this scene when he
wrote,
22
He committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth. 23 When he was reviled, he did not
revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued
entrusting himself to him who judges justly.
24 He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we
might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been
healed. 25 For you were
straying like sheep, but have now returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your
souls… (I
Pet 2:22-25).
Be
encouraged that Jesus is in control. The leaders thought they had the
upper hand, but they could only do what God allowed, for His purpose. Jesus
willingly endured injustice before men, so that we could be justified, declared
righteous, before God. Do you ever feel life isn’t fair? Have you ever asked,
“What did I do to deserve this?” When people ask me that, my usual answer is, “You
were born into a fallen world.” Remember what Jesus endured for us! There will
not always be justice in this life – but know this: Jesus came to undo the
Fall! And He has revealed to us the end of the story: Spoiler alert: Jesus
wins! And so do we, if we are His. AMEN.